Medical Fascism in the Lancet

David Bell and Domini Gordon

Medical ethics are about protecting society from medical malfeasance and the self-interest of the humans whom we trust to manage health. It is therefore disturbing when prominent people, in a prominent journal, tear up the concept of medical ethics and human rights norms. It is worse when they ignore broad swathes of evidence, and misrepresent their own sources, to do so.

,,, The Lancet was once a credible journal with a rigorous policy of peer review. However, in this article it appears to have dropped its former standards, promoting medical fascism (coercion, threat and division to achieve compliance with authority) without insisting on a rigorous evidence base to justify such an approach. This suggests an attempt to normalize such approaches in mainstream public health.

Latest articles

Non-GMO Project Is it possible to create a non-GMO product using genetic...
Carlos A. Monteiro Orthodox teaching and practice on nutrition and health almost...
What They Don’t Want to Tell You About Genetically Modified Crops and...
Environmental Health Symposium While we were distracted with Covid-19, lockdowns, mask mandates,...
Royal Lee “There is only one test for safety and wholesomeness in...
Weston A. Price Foundation WE HAVE ALWAYS PROCESSED OUR FOOD; this is...

Thank you!

The form has been submitted successfully!