Time to Assume that Health Research is Fraudulent until Proven Otherwise?

Richard Smith

Health research is based on trust. Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. But about 20% of the time, said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, they would be wrong. 

… We have long known that peer review is ineffective at detecting fraud, especially if the reviewers start, as most have until now, by assuming that the research is honestly reported. 

… We have now reached a point where those doing systematic reviews must start by assuming that a study is fraudulent until they can have some evidence to the contrary. 

Latest articles

Bruce Scott In Part I of Menticide 101 and the Brainwashing of...
Bruce Scott It has become quite clear, especially during the last two...
Joseph Mercola Scientists warn repeated COVID boosters may result in lowered immunity...
Mitchell Brent Liester Chlorine dioxide has been condemned as a dangerous poison...
Paul Elkins The recent White House guidance for people to take the...
Igor Chudov The times are changing! Remember how we said that vaccine shedding...

Your donation helps us
stand up for health freedom!

Canada Health Alliance is volunteer run and 100% supported by the generous donations of those who share our concerns and value our work.

Thank you!

The form has been submitted successfully!