An Epidemic of Misguided Moralising

Emily Schroeder

… Science thrives on open debate, yet all too often any attempt to question the mainstream narrative (as Semmelweis, Harvey and countless other great scientists did) is stifled by ad hominem attacks. It should be possible to disprove a theory without attacking the theorizer. Yet too many lockdown advocates accused sceptics of disregarding human life, despite the very opposite being true. Scientists and commentators opposed lockdowns precisely because they were so concerned about the loss of life, such as from diseases other than Covid (which, strangely enough, still exist), poverty, suicide or domestic abuse. (See Laura Dodsworth’s A State of Fear). Lockdowns undeniably caused many deaths. The question is whether they prevented even a single Covid death — and there is reason to believe that they didn’t …

Latest articles

The Goddard Report A podcast with Dr. Stephen Malthouse on “Making Doctors...
www.OpenSourceTruth.com All previous outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics end when Community Immunity, NOT...
Amanuensis Variants have been one of the hallmarks of this pandemic, with...
Samuel Reinfeld et al. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have a deleterious...

Thank you!

Thank you for your membership application. As soon as your payment has been received your membership will be activated and you will be informed via email.

Thank you.

Thank you!

The form has been submitted successfully!