Social Scientists Can’t Predict Better Than Laymen, Study Finds

Noah Carl

The pandemic has shone a spotlight on public health ‘experts’.

Many initially opposed lockdown, before abruptly changing their view when doing so became politically convenient. They said that masks don’t work, only to turn around and back mandates. And after assuring us the vaccines would stop transmission, they were met with overwhelming data to the contrary.

In October of last year, I wrote about two studies in which ‘experts’ and laymen were asked to forecast weekly Covid numbers. ‘Experts’ performed somewhat better in the first study, but actually performed worse in the second. A possible explanation for the divergent results is that laymen in the second study were self-selected and hence better-informed about the subject matter.

These findings don’t inspire confidence in the ‘experts’ who’ve guided us through the pandemic. After all, the most basic task of science is to predict things, so if scientists can’t predict better than laymen, that suggests their theories are wrong. And if their theories are wrong, we probably shouldn’t listen to them …

Latest articles

Dawn Lester & David Parker … As we have shown in many...
Dawn Lester & David Parker Modern medicine is widely acclaimed as being...
Dawn Lester & David Parker In parts one and two, we showed...
Dawn Lester & David Parker In the three previous parts of this...
Roger Koops For those who may not recall Chicken Little (AKA Henny...
Tristan Coleman Does the latest ‘climate consensus’ study show a genuine agreement...

Thank you!

Thank you for your membership application. As soon as your payment has been received your membership will be activated and you will be informed via email.

Thank you.

Thank you!

The form has been submitted successfully!